A Cursory View of "the Reasonable Person Standard"

  • I was intrigued by wikipedia’s article: Reasonable person. Specifically:
    • “In law, a reasonable person … is a hypothetical person of legal fiction crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions”
    • “Strictly according to the fiction, it is misconceived for a party to seek evidence from actual people in order to establish how the reasonable [ed. person] would have acted or what he/she would have foreseen.”
  • Having been chided for saying: “What?! Are you nuts?!”, I wonder if I can get away with asking someone: “Aren’t you being unreasonable?” :grinning:

Screenshot 2022-07-03 at 11-04-07 Reasonable person standard - Google Search

Some extol their rationality to the exclusion of other facts, using highly motivated reasoning. It just came up yesterday:
 

This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

“Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone.” -Colossians 4:6

This is a place for gracious dialogue about science and faith. Please read our FAQ/Guidelines before posting.