- I was intrigued by wikipedia’s article: Reasonable person. Specifically:
- “In law, a reasonable person … is a hypothetical person of legal fiction crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions”
- “Strictly according to the fiction, it is misconceived for a party to seek evidence from actual people in order to establish how the reasonable [ed. person] would have acted or what he/she would have foreseen.”
- Having been chided for saying: “What?! Are you nuts?!”, I wonder if I can get away with asking someone: “Aren’t you being unreasonable?”
Some extol their rationality to the exclusion of other facts, using highly motivated reasoning. It just came up yesterday:
This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.