Science vs. Scientist?
Or just two different flavors of science?
1 Like
I didnāt make it past 4:30 in. It drives me nuts when anyone brings up Haekelās embryos in textbooks. What Michael Behe is doing is quite dishonest I canāt stand to watch more. Haekel was wrong, but he was definitely on to something much deeper and more convincing than his drawings ever could have been. Critics of evolution love to bring it up as if it somehow demonstrates that āevolutionistsā just make stuff up to support their fairy tale- without ever addressing the actual evidence that we know from embryology today. Iām not sure why Behe is objecting anyways as I thought he was just fine with common descent.
@gbrooks9 Maybe itās just my mood but I went a bit further much to my regret (up to ~30 min or so). Maybe it will float some othersā boats but this whole thing seems like a big joke and he plays the grand conspiracy narrative very well and of course accuses Judge Jones of not understanding anything. Glad the fella to the left of him helps correct some of this ridiculousness. Behe really wants the āproblemsā with evolution to be taught and the alternative scientific theories taught- but what are they? Not intelligent design as that has no mechanisms at all- it is just a god of the gaps argument despite any claims that āthese things really look designed you guys.ā Iām out of here for real this time.
3 Likes
Maybe @pevaquarkās experience is a good caveat emptorā¦ Start the video well AFTER 4:30 minutes!
Itās a fairly robust videoā¦ thereās no reason to put yourself through the difficult partsā¦
This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.