I think Steve answered this well. The word “evolutionism” is an unfortunate one, as is scientism. But thats what we got. If evolutionism were called “Potscamism” then it would be no problem to be an evolutionist whlle being and anti potscamist. For example if someone said that a particular bird evolved from an earlier type of bird by Darwinian natural selection, I would agree. (given the genetic or anatomical evidence). But if I were told that smart phones evolved from flip phones by Darwinian natural selection, I would suggest that while such evolution (meaning change in this context) might seem to follow some of the parameters of NS, the actual mechanism of the appearance of smart phones was entirely different.