What I said was simply that the possibility of a historical Adam and Eve, elevated by God to sanctity and from whom all of us descend, is real and not refuted by science (with “nor confirmed” I obviously meant, for anyone who has the reading comprehension of a second grader and can understand the context, that science can’t prove the historicity of an original pair elevated by God from whom all humans descend, in other words I meant that the possibility is real -contrarily to what some people argue, because there are people who argue that an historical Adam and Eve are a scientific impossibility and that the orthodox Christian doctrine is demonstrably incorrect- but it cannot be proven and established as a scientific fact and remains just a possibility).
I have also distinguished between genealogical ancestry and genetic ancestry. You are nitpicking over isolated words without bothering to acknowledge what I’m actually saying in the context and what my actual thesis is
I don’t know how or why you are allowed to keep behaving like this, to be honest, but it’s embarrassing.