I’m doing some modelling right now and I’m frustrated that the points seem to come out right in the middle of two possible scenarios.
Not long ago, when trying to determine the number of modification sites in a protein, experiments indicated 1.5 sites.
That was frustrating but expected. It aligns perfectly in with my proof of God via Ironic Design.
That is: It is highly improbable that a designer would leave ambiguous, non-objectively discernible marks on its creation. Similarly, it is improbable that a purely natural, designer-less universe would leave ambiguous marks behind. Considering the great difficulty in demonstrating the existence or non-existence of a designer throughout the ages, this leaves one to conclude: The universe was designed so as to make the certainty of a designer completely indeterminable.
Case in point: The mass of the Higgs boson. Theories suggested two likely mass ranges for the boson; a lower number, compatible with supersymmetry models, and a higher number, compatible with multi-universe theories. The European Large Hadron Collider experiments converged on a mass for the Higgs Boson almost perfectly in the middle, a mass where the field expects the universe to be unstable.
Ironic Design: Because the designer has a sense of humor.