Why does Theology have to be so complicated?

Pascal’s wager doesn’t require evidence for God or the bible, so by resorting to it you are rendering your own use of Pascal’s wager pointless.

As for your “demonstrably proven” miracles: name three.

I’m reminded that you also claimed there were multiple faked hominid fossils, one of which was still on display, a claim you couldn’t back up.

If you had historical support for religious claims you wouldn’t bother with Pascal’s wager.

Yet you couldn’t bring yourself to quote the rest of it.

Here it is again:

You seem to have a habit of responding only to critiques you think you can deal with, and ignoring the rest.

P.S. I’m surprised you responded on Xmas day. I’d have thought you had more important things to do.