Which you do based on a MSWWV.
Your worldview shows every time you claim that Genesis is giving scientific information. But I keep asking, where does Genesis say it intends to provide such information?
Cross referencing as a way of understanding documents is flawed from the start – you have to start with the documents in their own worldview and setting. You instead force your worldview onto the documents, so all that your cross-referencing will ever do is reinforce your worldview – you’re going in circles.
Internal biblical references are insufficient for reading the Bible. Limiting yourself to them results in never even understanding what you’re reading. The Bible doesn’t tell you itself what kinds of literature it uses, you have to look outside to find that out; the Bible itself doesn’t tell you how Hebrew grammar works, you have to look outside to find that out; the Bible doesn’t even tell you what the words mean, you have to go to linguistics to find that out!
These are all foundational, part of the historical-grammatical method that YEC claims to follow but tramples right and left. You’re trying to skip the foundation, which means all you will ever get is your own thoughts, you will never see what Moses or anyone else intended. And when presented with facts about the documents, e.g. that the first Genesis Creation account is a reworking of the Egyptian creation story, you deny the facts and replace them with your personal MSWV.
That is all shallow; it is in fact blind – you’re like the aliens in Galaxy Quest, not even knowing what kind of literature you’re looking at.
That;s a lie and you know it. You have in fact never even commented on my theology; for your convenience, here it is again:
I believe in one God, the Father, almighty maker of heaven and earth, of all things seen and unseen.
I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the uniquely-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages/worlds;
God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God;
begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father;
by whom all things were made:
Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven,
was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary,
and was made Man;
and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate;
He suffered and was buried,
and on the third day He rose again in accordance with the scriptures,
and ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father;
and He shall come again in glory to judge both the living and dead;
whose kingdom shall have no end.
I believe in the Holy SPirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
Who proceeds from the Father,
who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified;
Who spoke by the prophets.
ANd I believe in one catholic and apostolic church;
I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins;
I look for the resurrection of the body*, and the life of the world to come.
*yes, that’s imported from the Apostles’ Creed, but I use it since it stands clearly against the idiots I know who think we’re all going to be some sort of disembodied spirits drifting about
== + == ♱ == + ==
There’s my theology. You have never addressed it. And since most of what you do isn’t theology but science fiction, I really don’t expect that you will.
And is something you made up given that I didn’t say it.
Stop lying about people, and stop making stuff up that people didn’t say!