So wait a second here. You are telling me that a few stones found in Peru is your world changing evidence, that the original forger admitted were fake. And that’s some of the only evidence, ever in the history of the world that humans supposedly lived with dinosaurs… Common man! That’s insane! Where are the loads of dino bones dated to be close to modern homo sapiens? Why are they never ever buried with human beings? Not once. Like ever? Especially if we rode them like those magic stones.
Here’s an example of real creatures that coexisted with the people of South America:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/06/giant-jaguars-colossal-bears-done-deadly-combo-humans-and-heat
And some more stuff that lived down there:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018215000899
So if the stones are even real (which they’re not) there is some crazy stuff that ancient humans had to deal with! That’ll give for some nice stories back in the cave. The Genesis Park article just makes me sad. That someone is literally traveling around South America with a few fake stones in a bag looking for non-existant evidence that humans and dinosaurs coexisted.
My thoughts on the article:
- So… when did these stones get made? The point of the article is trying to make an early date… like sometime BC? The earliest traces of any kind of bronze on South America was the Moche culture which lived after 200 AD and probably didn’t get around to it until 500 AD or so (Bronze Age - Wikipedia).
- He compares the magic rocks of Ica to the one the guy made on the spot- Basilio probably whips them up like hotcakes to sell them and make a living (Basilio Uschuya- if you’re here Basilio, hello!) - meaning that is a ridiculous thing to use to prove your point - it’s like trying to prove the Earth is young by looking a globe
- Nobody knows where they come from, sigh… like if that could ever be given it could go a long ways
- Why not make some fakes and throw them in a bunch of random caves for many years seeing how they age? That’s a nice way to test your hypothesis too
- The story about Drum, who is a real scientist is also sad, since it basically is a waste of space in their article giving the reader the impression a real scientist thinks they were old and also magically prove that dinosaurs coexisted with humans (which he doesn’t think or say that at all)
This is the weakest case I’ve ever seen for a real idea and yes, I am being very critical of this. Not because I don’t like you, but the idea is terrible. Especially when the idea is paraded around as if it’s absolute proof that the Earth is Young. It’s a very unsubstantiated claim that if even it was real, also has many reasonable real explanations that are based on actual real evidence (ie the South American Megafauna listed above).
In other news, despite all I just said, this is pretty convincing proof to me: