I have not. …so it’s a kind of ‘capture phrase’ to draw people like me in then. I see.
I can understand the drive to challenge conventions and rock boats at times. We can all be called to do that on occasion. But you might find communication with others to be less frustrating, and they might find you less frustrating if you use language the way everybody around you understands it. The stuff we hold in common … “language” - it’s a gift. Don’t scorn it.
This is a false dichotomy. Literature often works on multiple levels at once. Animal Farm is a story about farm animals AND a commentary on Russian political realities. I agree that Genesis is written the way it was written to fit with Hebrew narratives and identity marking. But the text we have was compiled during the Exile, not immediately post-Exodus, even if maybe some of the oral texts used originated around that time.
I’m not going to read your interpretation because I’m not really interested in the musings of individuals that are untethered from the intepretive traditions of the faith and the realities of how texts and communication work. Lots of people come on this forum convinced the Holy Spirit has revealed some special insight to them. But I’m not looking for special insight, I’m looking for consensus scholarship and credible refining of consensus scholarship. I don’t think you get to be a teacher just because you claim wisdom.
i understand. I approach this more from a scientific point of view: I seek for repeatable facts, not consensus. I did not claim that I received some special revelation, these facts have been there for centuries. Sadly, tradition and consensus have concealed them.