It appears to be just as much theological, economic, linguistic or sociological fence sitting ‘in intent.’ Please don’t think you hold the ‘only definition’ possible, Eddie. Your claim of inevitable ‘implications’ are rather mere ‘suggestions’ that intelligent people should openly question. Remember: most Christians reject the IDism that you embrace.
You are currently choosing actively to ‘fence sit’ and express no conviction about historical Adam and Eve, Eddie, aren’t you? Even today you actually reject (or simply ‘take no opinion about’) the Orthodox and Catholic teachings about historical A&E, don’t you?
Please don’t play rhetorical tricks based on the political field you are trained in that is aimed at making people believe you have answered a question, when in fact you haven’t. Orthodox, Catholic & mainstream Christians who know the catechism and teaching most likely see through your theological ‘relativism’ regarding A&E.
It is not too much to ask for an honest answer, especially from someone who claims to be a ‘Christian theologian’ as Eddie. I asked a simple, clear, straight-forward question regarding ‘theological monogenesis.’ To establish this, I referenced Ken Kemp’s article “Science, Theology and Monogenesis”. Neither IDists nor BioLogos people have yet responded.