You’re misreading me. My point has not been that we know for sure “that the wine would have appeared identical to old wine in every possible fashion, in every perspective,” but rather that we don’t know those details and therefore can’t rule out that possibility.
You and I must be using the words “naturally” and “supernaturally” in different ways. My usage was that an earth created over a 4.543B year period implies an earth created by natural processes, while an earth created over six days implies an earth created by supernatural processes.
I look at it that these histories are inferred through examination of artifacts and by other means by archaeologists, and appear impressive; however, if the word of God states otherwise, I will trust the word of God.
To explain further, see @Swamidass’s Riddle of the 100 Year Old Tree here and my response to it here.