Two questions about how central the question of origins is to your core beliefs

Then use consistent terminology. Do not claim that

and then that they are all within a “kind”. Use “kind” whenever you are referring to something other than the standard definition of species.

A genus is not a population. It is a set of similar or closely related species of a convenient size for communicaticatory purposes. This is untrue and a slander against taxonomists.

I gave an example of where viable hybrids can form between different species that no one sane will claim are conspecific. That is abundantly relevant.

Was the flood water saline? Then virtually all of the freshwater organisms died. If it was fresh, then virtually all of the marine organisms died. There is one endemically freshwater phylum known. Sessile terrestrial organisms and non-salt tolerant plants cannot survive being under a salty ocean.

Yes. And defines them in a way that matches modern species, not made-up hyperevolving proto-kinds that solely exist to be able to fit more animals on the ark.

Slugs would die faster than birds.

2 Likes