Genesis 1:1,3 show God causing the Big Bang as of 13.78 billion years ago. But Genesis 1:2 adds, as detail, the prior pagan view of the cosmology of the universe, and extrapolates upon in on Day 2 (placing half the waters of Creation above the vault of the sky) and Day 4 (placing sun moon and stars within the vault of the sky hence out of the way of (below) those waters. Yet Planet Earth orbits the nearest star.
One chapter of Genesis, using the extant pagan perception-is-reality, demonstrates the Creator but presents only Sunday School flannel-board images in place of fact. We have spent the last 250 years, i.e. the Age of Science, to put that number, 13.78, into play. To burden Genesis with a “just the facts” view of Creation, such as to the extent we have it today, would have hidden the Creator behind thousands of pages of techno-speak.
Viewing Genesis v. science from this end of the telescope, story accomplishes the important work of God communicating theology.
Viewing Genesis vs. science from this end of the telescope, story accomplishes the important work of presenting profound theological truths to six-year-olds in Sunday School, and ordinary pre-literate adult early Hebrew minds. One page presents the Creator not creation note the small c.
I understand your discomfort - it was mine also, some time ago. Since then I have developed the opinion that facts have no value until interpreted by spirit (mind, soul, consciousness, what have you) which implies that truth or value or importance of meaning or truth. Two plus two equals four isn’t true, it is fact. The difference is critical when discussing the truth of Scripture. Science is fact; when a reading of Scripture violates fact, the reading has to give way. Creation is fact; so is the Big Bang.
So, yes, I am saying that Spirit and Science operate in parallel but not necessarily in concordance.
Creation is material. Spirit is of God. Material is of God. Material is fact; Spirit is in the realm of meaning purpose soul importance love and God.