Theology questions Adam wants ECs to answer

[St.Roymond]

@Christy

These are all off-topic on this post. If you want to discuss them, start new threads, and address one of them at a time. But it gets frustating when you keep insisting things that aren’t true or are gross simplifications or insist on putting someone else’s claims into your own presuppositions that we don’t share.

But they illustrate the concept here: these are items that have in fact been answered, and/or aren’t accurate to begin with, and thus serve as examples of how conspiracy thinking works, specifically by ignoring what doesn’t fit – as you go on to note:

@Christy

This really doesn’t have anything to do with allegory and shows that when people try to explain nuanced biblical scholarship to you, it somehow doesn’t compute in your brain and then you go around saying people claimed stuff they never came close to asserting.

@Christy

@adamjedgar

this means you simply turn a blind eye and ignore it.

Whole books have been written on the topic of original sin and death and the EC position. There are multiple FAQs on the BioLogos website with well-researched, expert-reviewed answers to questions about death, sin, and the fall.

Ironically, the repeated posting of answered questions is a superb example of turning a blind eye and ignoring things!