Look, this is getting tiresome: STOP THE LYING.
You know it’s lying, because you’ve been told repeatedly that it is. YEC and atheists and others may apply science to the Creation stories, but I reject that – I reject six literal days because that is not what the text teaches, period.
I know you have a category difficulty here, seemingly unable to recognize when people don’t fit your tidy pigeonhole definitions, but that’s been pointed out, too. I don’t fit in your “Darwinian” category. Apparently you don’t have a category for people who stubbornly stick to the text and won’t be budged by your views.
So? All that shows is that normally people don’t rise from the dead – the very same thing the Bible agrees with. It doesn’t predict that it won’t happen, and it can’t possibly say it can’t. You’re making science into an idol, claiming for it more than what it is capable of.
That’s your dilemma – you invented it. It’s only a dilemma when you make an idol out of science.
I have no idea why you keep inventing problems and assigning them to me. My worldview is “the text, the whole text, and nothing but the text”,
No, I just reject your making science into an idol with powers it isn’t capable of.
Look, Adam: science can’t even prove the sun will come up tomorrow – it can predict it, but it can’t prove it – so it certainly can’t prove that a Resurrection can’t happen. It can predict that one won’t, but predictions are like farts: you don’t know if it happened until it does.
Oh – I reject YEC because it rejects the text of the scriptures. That it is pseudoscience is just an interesting additional reality.