When you find yourself in the midst of a new explanation of the scriptures, you must first reread the Bible and see if your eyes will not open up facing this new revelation. God often reveals certain things with time in mind. I don’t want to divinize my thoughts but, know that since the biblical scheme of creation was written 3500 years ago, it is for the first time that someone exploits it to explain the scheme of the Universe from the origin to the man without break. For your concern, I ask you to reread Genesis 1:1-9. You have just raised a very important point, namely that the earth was not created until later in the evolution of the universe. But, it is the Bible that was the first to raise this point. The earth that it speaks of on the first day was defined as an invisible and empty earth signifying the universe at its beginning. Our visible planet earth was not created until the third stage or the third biblical day. With this analysis where the biblical days were periods, we can see that the Bible is not in contradiction with science which has discovered the true duration of these days or gaps. As for the point concerning the Big-bang, I want to come back in my next publications. Until then, I am only following the verses that concern the pre-Big-bang period.
Who is the publisher?
I have been forbidden in this forum to put a link to my publications. Here, I only bring the summaries of my findings on the biblical scheme of creation and I limit myself to that. In this summary I can only put links to other researchers to show that I am not alone in my thinking. However, if you type my name “FLAVIEN PHANZU MWAKA” in a search engine, you will discover my publications.
How would we differentiate this from us projecting our own thoughts and ideas onto the scriptures?
Avg rating: 0.0 0 ratings
£0.00
Currently unavailable
By returning to reality
How does that work?
We don’t understand each other anymore, if you can be more precise.
There is every chance that the verses you are looking at were never meant to describe the physical nature of the universe. So how do you determine if this is the case?
I spent seven years studying it. If I had discovered that there are phenomena that are contrary to science, I would never have had to publish it. If I understand the universe better nowadays, it is from this diagram that describes the universe from before the Big Bang to man. Only, the author of this diagram tells it as one tells a story and not as one gives a mathematics course. This is why my restitution provokes a lot of debates and I am very pleased to discover the relevance of my work.
That doesn’t address the question I asked. Here it is again:
There is every chance that the verses you are looking at were never meant to describe the physical nature of the universe. So how do you determine if this is the case?
Which verses? So far, I am only focusing on the first two chapters of Genesis and that describes the physical nature of the universe. The very title of this chapter, which is also called the first verse, says “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth”. And, from the second verse, we went into details.
No you went in to even more grandiose idiolect.
How did you determine that those verses were meant to describe the physical universe?
By its content; mainly from verse 2 of the first chapter to the end of the second chapter. Verse 1 of the first chapter I have developed here: What does "in the beginning god created... the earth" mean?
Why the ellipsis?
From what I can see, you just assume those verses are meant to be an accurate physical description of the universe’s history. You never consider that those verses could have been symbolic and never meant to describe the universe’s history.
Particularly as they are a Sabbatarian tract with a political agenda (I know your replying to me is incidental).
Fortunately, you understood me after several misunderstandings between the two of us. To me, these verses are supposed to be an accurate physical description of the history of the universe. I used to think it was symbolic too, like everyone else. But when I looked into it, I discovered that there was a real pattern hidden inside.
This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.