The Big Bang Idea

[Klax (The only thing that matters is faith expressed in love.)]

@MikeBoll

@Klax

@MikeBoll

But let me just answer the questions you won’t for you…

Yes, you believe that the appearance of design apparent in Stonehenge indicates design.
No, you don’t believe the appearance of design apparent in living things indicates design.

These contradictory conclusions expose bias and irrationality.

I’m glad you’re aware of it, there is hope therefore.

Yes, I have been aware of your bias and irrationality on this matter from the moment you refused to answer simple and direct questions.

@Klax

So what do you propose to do to reconcile that? Do you need help?

You could have helped me by simply answering the questions in an honest and direct manner. Since you refused my requests for help, I reconciled it by just answering them truthfully for you.

@Klax

That’s the next step. Asking for help.

Thanks for asking. The help I offer you now is to point out that next time things will go a lot easier if you just answer the questions as honestly as you can the first time. Hope that helps.

The only help you can give Mike is the science of the solid firmament. Where does it start? How far does it go? What’s it made of?

[Klax (The only thing that matters is faith expressed in love.)]

@MikeBoll

@Klax

Yes but what about the solid firmament? And whether pigs have wings?

Interesting. Isn’t the idea to which you subscribe that posits non-winged creatures developed wings?

I posit no such thing. I posit whether they did,

[Mervin_Bitikofer]

Okay - it looks to me if this thread has run its course. Several times, I think. Thanks everyone for your contributions. Go make sure your loved ones still know you exist.

Merv