In fact, I do not, and neither does “evolution,” because all descendants of dogs will still fall into the classification ‘canid’ no matter how morphologically bizarre they may become.
There, I supported @glipsnort’s claim for you! Do you believe it now?
It was rather tempting to quote everything you’ve ever said about evolution as supporting evidence, but that would be a daunting amount of work and frankly I don’t think you’d change your mind about much, if anything.
If you’re only in this to refine counterarguments, and you have never even considered re-evaluating the validity of your core propositions, and you don’t cite sources or support your statements when asked, except to insult the asker, why should it be worth our time to present you with thoughtful, researched responses?