Oh, yes, sorry, got it–Paul Opposes Peter Galatians 2: 11-14
11 But when Cephas [Peter] came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For before certain men came from James, he was eating with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party.[a] 13 And the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically along with him, so that even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. 14 But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, “If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?”
But I am editing this to say that the Rule o Faith in Allert’s podcast with Enns does weed out such discrepancies.
I do think that the Bible is inspired and reliable–Enns is pretty interesting. I do think Bird is a great counterpoint (Bird and Boyd have both countered the nonbelievers Ehrmann) and Vanhoozer even has an article at biologos.org which shows great insight. It helps me to read all points of view. I’m not going to say Enns is right all the time. Warning…sometimes I don’t know where he even stops in deconstructing, though I believe he really does believe (Sin of Certainty is a more positive book).So on second thought maybe 5 Views on Biblical Inerrancy, which includes Enns, would be better for you to start. There is a thread about it here Five Views On Biblical Inerrancy: A Review