Scientific Controversy: Did Homo naledi bury their dead and make art?

Many animal species “grieve” their dead. I can’t remember if it’s dolphins or orcas (or both) that will push their dead infants and juveniles to the surface and keep them with the pod for days and days. I don’t know about ants. I’ve squashed quite a few on my deck and watched their compadres carry the bodies back to the antbed. I suspect they’re eating them rather than burying them. haha

Flint Dibble’s father (OP video) made his name re-excavating earlier claimed Neanderthal burials. It’s an interesting rabbit hole that I’ve been sucked down before.

2 Likes

Thanks for reminding me of the Dibble video. The kitchen is extra clean now (watched while I washed). I have no idea how big the cave is, or the chain, or what air flow is like, but I’ve wondered how they didn’t die of smoke inhalation, if it’s small and confined.

1 Like

Perhaps another shared behavior…

1 Like
  • Rising Star Cave
    • History
      • Geologists think the cave in which the fossils were discovered is no older than three million years.[6]

The cave was explored in the 1980s by the Speleological Exploration Club (SEC), a local branch of the South African Speleological Association (SASA).[3]

Discovery of fossils in “Dinaledi Chamber”


On 13 September 2013, while exploring the Rising Star cave system, recreational cavers Rick Hunter and Steven Tucker of the Speleological Exploration Club (SEC) found a narrow, vertically oriented “chimney” or “chute” measuring 12 m (39 ft) long with an average width of 20 cm (7.9 in).[2][5][7][8] Then Hunter discovered a room 30 m (98 ft) underground (Site U.W.101[9] or UW-101, the Dinaledi Chamber), the surface of which was littered with fossil bones. On 1 October, photos of the site were shown to Pedro Boshoff and then to Lee Berger, both of the University of the Witwatersrand.[7][10]

The arrangement of bones, as well as several survey pegs, suggested “someone had already been there” as recently as a few decades earlier.[2][5] The appearance of limited fossilisation initially led the explorers to think the bones were from the last caver into the chamber, who had subsequently never made it back out alive.[2]

2013 and 2014 excavations

Berger organized an expedition to excavate the fossils, which started on 7 November 2013.[10] The expedition was funded by the South African National Research Foundation and the National Geographic Society.[11][12]

The excavation team enlisted six paleoanthropologists, all of whom were women, who could pass through an opening only 18 cm (7 inches) wide to access the Dinaledi Chamber.[10][13][14] Those chosen were Hannah Morris, Marina Elliott, Becca Peixotto, Alia Gurtov, Lindsay Eaves, and Elen Feuerriegel.[15] They have since been nicknamed the Underground Astronauts.[16]

The Dinaledi Chamber was assigned the designation UW-101 (or U.W.101[9]) and was excavated by these six members of the Rising Star Expedition during November 2013. More than 1,200 fossil elements were recovered and catalogued in November 2013,[17] representing at least a dozen individuals.[18] Only 20 out of 206 bones in the human body were not found in the cave as of Summer 2014.[19] By April 2014, between two localities, 1,754 specimens were recovered.[20]

The layered distribution of the bones [in clay-rich sediments] suggests that they had been deposited over a long period of time, perhaps centuries.[2][5] Only one square meter of the cave chamber has been excavated; other remains might still be there.[5][11][21][22]

On 20 February 2014, Rick Hunter, Lee Berger, John Hawks, Alia Gurtov, and Pedro Boshoff returned to Rising Star to evaluate a second potential site. The site, designated UW-102 (or U.W.102, aka Lesedi Chamber),[9] was found by cavers Rick Hunter and Steve Tucker on the last day of the first Rising Star Expedition, and limited excavation began in April 2014.[20][23]

As of September 2015, fossils of at least fifteen individuals, amounting to 1,550 specimens, had been excavated from the cave.[1][2] About 300 bone fragments were collected from the surface of the Dinaledi Chamber, and about 1,250 fossil specimens were recovered from the chamber’s main excavation pit, Unit 3.[5] The fossils include skulls, jaws, ribs, teeth, bones of an almost complete foot, of a hand, and of an inner ear. The bones of both old and young individuals, as well as infants, were found.[1][2]

The 15 partial skeletons, which were found in a small underground chamber, invite speculation on the circumstances of their location. Paleoanthropologist John D. Hawks, from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who is a member of the team, has stated that the scientific facts are that all the bones recovered are hominin, except for those of one owl; there are no signs of predation, and there is no predator that accumulates only hominins this way; the bones did not accumulate there all at once. There is no evidence of rocks or sediment having dropped into the cave from any opening in the surface; no evidence of water flowing into the cave carrying the bones into the cave.[5][24][25]

Hawks concluded that the best hypothesis is that the bodies were deliberately placed in the cave after death, by other members of the species.[26] Berger et al. suggest that “these individuals were capable of ritual behaviour.” They speculate the placing of dead bodies in the cave was a ritualistic behaviour, a sign of symbolic thought.[27] “Ritual” here means an intentional and repeated practice (disposing of dead bodies in the cave), and not implying any type of religious ritual.[6] This hypothesis has been criticised for its improbability.[28][29]

A study involving the statistical reconstruction of hominin evolutionary trees from skull and tooth measurements, originally indicated that the most likely age for H. naledi was 912 kya.[30][31][32]

  • The age of the original Homo naledi remains from the Dinaledi Chamber has been revealed to be startlingly young in age. Homo naledi, which was first announced in September 2015, was alive sometime between 335 and 236 thousand years ago. This places this population of primitive small-brained hominins at a time and place that it is likely they lived alongside Homo sapiens.
    — Wits University 9 May 2017

A collaborative workshop involving 54 local and international scientists took place in May 2014 at the University of the Witwatersrand,[2][20][33] On 10 September 2015, the fossils were publicly unveiled and given the name Homo naledi.[1][5]

3 Likes

The Past — April 12, 2022 Homo sapiens is #9. Who were the eight other human species? There were at least eight other human species, some of whom existed for far longer than we have. Who were they?

  • Key Takeaways
    • Most experts agree that our species, Homo sapiens (Latin for “wise men”), is the ninth and youngest human species.
    • The lives of the other eight species tell a story of how humans slowly evolved away from the other apes, developing the ability to walk, eat meat, hunt, build shelters, and perform symbolic acts.
    • Our ancestors probably pushed our closest relatives, the Neanderthals, to extinction. Wise guys finish last.
2 Likes

That’s a whole bunch of Wikipedia to copy-and-paste.

Saw this today and thought it was a cool way to illustrate human evolution.

1 Like

I was specifically thinking about copyright infringement issues. It’s also routinely a problem in many other threads around here. “Fair use” only covers a limited number of words per quotation. Just something for the mods to think about.

2 Likes

Wikipedia is creative commons. Go nuts.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  • for any purpose, even commercially.

This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.

  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
3 Likes

Interesting. I didn’t know that was their policy.

1 Like

  • Freeze-dry your pets?
    • Next to come: Get your body freeze-dried in time for your wake.
  • Literary interlude: Homework - Read William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying,
1 Like

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03457-8

2 Likes

I have no idea what you’re getting at.

2 Likes

Do we really need to post inside jokes? Did you just waste my time?

This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.