woah! Sees ‘Tiktaalik and Pakicetus’ which read an article on YEC/DI site about that ‘proves’ their fakes
knows entire list is fake, mocks fake fossils that were not exposed by better Bible readers but skeptical scientists as those didn’t match the understood general direction of human evolution
Feel free to edit the Wikipedia entries with real information then, or petition x, y or z to do so:
Unless maybe of course you’ve been lied to by Christians who do presuppositional science where you come to a conclusion first and twist data to match your interpretation of a 2000 year old book. Note: if any scientists pulls this nonsense, he will be found out like the two fake fossils you cited above.
What dubious entries? I believe that was the point Matthew was making. Tiktaalik and Pakicetus are only “dubious” in the minds of Creationists who can’t stomach the idea that very nice examples of “transitional forms” exist.