Since most of the readers in this group won’t read this book, I’ll provide the review on Amazon that I provided last year. Here’s my review:
Contested Bones is an excellent book. Its content is expertly designed and written, carefully argued, and well supported by the scientific literature. The book demonstrates that the ape-to-man hypothesis is far from compelling. Citing a wide range of sources from the scientific literature (e.g., Nature, New Scientist, Scientific American, etc.) the authors have demonstrated that there is a serious lack of consensus within the scientific community on the ape-to-man story-line. Chapter 2 is titled “A Theory in Crisis.” It cites Bernard Wood, a paleoanthropologist from George Washington University where he says, “Even with all the fossil evidence and analytical techniques from the past 50 years, a convincing hypothesis for the origin of Homo remains elusive.” (Nature 508:31-33, 2014) The bulk of the book critically examines details of various fossil finds (e.g., Homo neanderthalensis, Homo erectus, Homo floresiensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Homo habilis, Australopithecus sediba and Homo naledi.) and shows that there is wide disagreement on their classification within the paleoanthropology community. Of particular interest to me was the Chapter on Dating Methods. Evolution requires time for the Neo-Darwinian mechanism to work. Can the earth be shown to be 4.5 billion years old? Rupe examines carefully the argument behind the most popular dating techniques (e.g., potassium-argon, argon-argon, Uranium-Thorium, and Uranium-Lead.) The depth and clarity of this chapter convinced me that the dating methods are not reliable. Rupe’s analysis is impressive and critics will strain to find fault. He supports his case with many citations from the scientific literature. This is the only book I’ve found that treats the subject with sufficient rigor to be convincing. The final topic of the book addresses the genetic evidence. Written by John Sanford, a true expert in the field, this chapter is quite revealing. Sanford has noted something that I personally have found true as I’ve investigated the evolution-creationism debate. Sanford notes, “It is true that most scientist are committed to the evolutionary framework, yet it is surprising that this strong commitment is not usually based upon the scientist’s own person experience or expertise. Most scientist need to look to experts in other fields (or even the popular media), to find support for their certainty about human evolution. This can become circular-scientists are consistently looking to other scientists to justify their personal certainty about human evolution.” Sanford concludes his introduction to this Chapter (13) by saying “Contrary to popular opinion, the genetic evidence does not support ape-to-man evolution. In fact, it strongly refutes it.” (pg. 286)
In summary, Contested Bones, is a valuable contribution to the literature arguing against the ape-to-man hypothesis. It’s well written, professional, and technically competent. It’s a must read for anyone with an interest in the ape-to-man evolutionary hypothesis and is an excellent reference source to what the scientific community is really saying, and not what the media is reporting