You don’t understand how publishers operate. Review copies are sent out well in advance of publication for “major” or important books. I would call it “Standard Operating Procedure.” Go have a look at this thread:
Seems that there’s a review of Behe’s new book in Science magazine, even though the book isn’t for sale yet. Despite the fact that you have no experience or knowledge of the publishing industry, you are bold enough to insinuate that the 2013 review of Meyer’s book was dishonest, since the reviewers couldn’t possibly have had time to read the book. This is the same dubious procedure you are using in your “evaluation” of evolution.
I don’t need to read “Contested Bones,” because I read the authors’ own article describing the book, and because I have spent the past two years researching the same “peer-reviewed sources” that they reputedly surveyed. The authors’ conclusions are ridiculous, and I can definitively say that they either are incompetent readers or else they willingly misrepresented their sources. If you want to actually learn something about evolution, you need to leave off reading propaganda and start reading actual science. Only then will you be able to sort the wheat from the chaff on the subject.