Question about the Book of Revelation

If it’s helpful, I take a different approach on this whole issue. Revelation 13.18 says this (following the NIV):

This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.

Now the starting point has to be understanding what John is actually saying here. And there are a couple of important ambiguities to consider.

The first is paragraph divisions. What does This calls for wisdom refer to? Most people assume we need wisdom to work out what 666 means. The NIV (and to be fair, many other translations) point in that direction by putting that sentence in the same paragraph as what follows.

But to me it makes more sense in context to read This calls for wisdom backwards, connecting it with what John has already said. Chapter 13 flows like this:

v1 - A dragon (=the Devil) on the shore, raising up two symbolic beasts in opposition to God and his people.
v1-10 - Beast #1, a picture of oppressive authority that persecutes the people of God. To which John says, This calls for patient endurance. That’s how God’s people must respond, and it clearly points back to the previous section.
v11-18 - Beast #2, a picture of false religion, which if possible will deceive the people of God. To which John says, This calls for wisdom. The parallelism and the natural thematic links make it clear (to me at least!) that this too is pointing backwards.

Now if all this is true, then the famous 666 verse turns out to be less important. we should read it as an afterthought, a sentence in brackets. It’s not the climax of the chapter.

Secondly, a translation issue. When John says The number of a man, we read this as referring to one particular human being. But Greek doesn’t have a word to distinguish between a man and man (without the article). The NIV footnote offers the alternative translation humanity’s number. So we have to interpret this. And my interpretation goes like this:

Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is a human number… That number is 666.

In other words, John is inviting us to come up with a representative number as a label for the beast. It is a human number; in other words it is a human term to describe a spiritual reality. And then John offers his own numerical suggestion: 666.

John never asks us to apply the number to some future individual. He’s already made the application. The number applies to the beast!. 666 is simply the name of the beast, just as 007 is simply the name of “Bond. James Bond.”

One last note. This is not a one off example. John does this elsewhere. See for example Revelation 21.17, where an angel is taking John on a tour of the new Jerusalem, the heavenly city. The angel has a gold rod and gives John the measurements of the city. The narrative clearly says the angel was using human measurements (literally the measurement of [a] man). The point here is that the human language is describing a spiritual reality beyond and greater than all human language. So it is with the beast and his number.

3 Likes

About the number of the beast:

We should look at the context of Revelation 13:18. Taking that verse out of the context gives a possibility for making all kinds of interpretations that may be far from the original meaning. I think @peterkp is on right tracks in this regard but I would stress the importance of the context even more.

We have a case where there is a dragon, then a beast that rises from the sea (seven heads, ten horns with crowns) and after that another beast that is coming up out of the earth (two horns like a lamb). The difference between the sea and the earth is important because that is a symbolic way to tell the origin of the beast - sea is usually (pagan) nations, earth may be the tribes of Israel or something close to it.

The last part of chapter 13 describes the actions of the second beast. It makes people bow the image of the first beast and gives a mark (to right hand or forehead) to those who bow the image. Without the mark you cannot buy or sell, so the sign is strongly tied to trading and monetary transactions. The mark is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

The context shows that the key point is not the name, it is bowing (worshipping) the image of the beast. The mark is just a given sign that you have bowed and can take part in the normal transactions of the society.

I am not an expert of that era but have read that there were times when you had to have a certificate that you had worshiped the image of the emperor. Without the certificate, you were an outcast. Perhaps the description was a steroid version of such demands.

In our modern culture, the number of the beast has been associated with all kinds of technical marks. I have heard people warn about barcodes and identification chips, claiming that if you accept these you take the mark of the beast. Rubbish. The key is the decision whether you will bow (worship) the image of the beast, or God. Without bowing (worshiping) in front of an idol, you do not get or take such a mark. Worshiping does not necessarily mean bowing in front of a statue but it means giving the highest authority in our life to someone else (idol) than God.

3 Likes

Hi Clovis, thank you for your question! :slight_smile:
Here are some free resources:

  1. https://bibleproject.com/podcast/series/apocalyptic-literature/

  2. Episodes | The Naked Bible Podcast (Revelation series, episode 352-405)

  3. Revelation | Psephizo

I hope this helps!

If you have some specific questions on certain passages, I can look it up in the books on Revelation I have in my library and send some pictures. :grinning:

1 Like

Interestingly, 6 by itself was “humanity’s number”: God’s number was 7, and humanity was just below God and so had the number 6. But 7 also meant holiness, in which case 6 meant something less than holy or a failure to be holy, which again applies to humanity. Repetition could indicate effort and/or outcome, so 6 three times could be read as an effort to be holy that resulted in total failure – but it could also mean an attempt to be like God that resulted in total failure.
And that brings to mind the declaration “I will be like God!”, which applies to Satan/Lucifer, yet this is a human number – which led me to ask one day if 666 could indicate Satan becoming incarnate, in response to which I was directed to a few sources in the campus library, where I found that I was hardly the first to make that suggestion.
So . . . considering that apocalyptic and prophecy both can point to more than one thing at the same time, 666 could be taken to indicate that since Jesus trashed the powers of darkness by becoming incarnate, Satan is going to try becoming incarnate to try to pull a victory out, somehow.
And additionally, the 666 could be pointing to Nero, or to Domitian, suggesting that they correlate with such an attempt.

1 Like

There were times when such a certificate was needed for a merchant to be allowed to enter the city of Rome, or to cross between provinces (IIRC one had to do with the merchant having proved he was not a Jew).

2 Likes

I read that Emperor Decian degreed that everyone, except Jews, must sacrifice and burn incense to the gods in the presence of a magistrate, and obtain a signed document (libellus) witnessed by the officials attesting to this. The libellus was the statement of the individual of his/her loyalty to the Empire.

I do not know about the demands during the previous emperors, except that captured Christians were punished if they did not sacrifice.

That matches my recollection of the Decian persecutions. Historians argue about just how much Decius pushed enforcement and whether the eighteen months the decree was in force would have been enough for even all Roman citizens to have been certified. In some places the temples were overwhelmed by the numbers of people seeking the certificates, and in a few civil order was threatened as many Christians abandoned the cities and towns so they could avoid making the required sacrifices, so I suspect that when Trebonianas Gallus came to the purple he was content to not renew the decree.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.