[quote=âwirkipedia, post:53, topic:43926â]
> Hence, the combined effects of chance and necessity, which are amenable to scientific investigation, account for our existence and the universe we inhabit, without the need to invoke mystical, supernatural, or religious explanations.
> [/quote]
I would agree that evolution is a natural process and as far as that is concerned it does not require a supernatural, dualistic explanation. However, there is no evidence that evolution created itself, but instead it is a rational, physical, and even spiritual phenomenon because it was created by God as part of the Big Bang.
Monod says that the universe is not rational, because it is natural, which he takes to mean solely physical. I would say that the universe is natural, because God created it that way and natural is more than physical, but also rational and spiritual.
The speculations that Monod makes to describe change and necessity are interesting. They seem to follow the old One And the Many paradigm which I find helpful philosophically, however it breaks down into a dualism without a third aspect. I would say that is why it fails to really justify its claims to give humans true free will.
> [quote=âwikipedia, post:53, topic:43926â]
> Monod advocates an objective (hence value-free) scientific worldview as a guide to assessing truth.
> [/quote]
Value-free means the life has no purpose or meaning and thus that there is no Truth. It is the ultimate âthrowing the baby out with the bath water.â It seems to me that he has much in common with Camus and Sartre, which makes sense as a Frenchman of his time.
> [quote=âwikipedia, post:53, topic:43926â]
> For Monod, assessing truth separate from any value judgement is what frees human beings to act authentically, by requiring that they choose the ethical values that motivate their actions.
> [/quote]
If acting âauthenticallyâ means that we act in a valueless vacuum means we have no choice, because our choice makes no difference. For the Christian every one has freewill because they have the choice between God/Jesus Christ/Love and Self. We must make the choice based on our values, our Ultimate Concern, thus who we really are. This is rational freewill. If for Monod we must choose between Chance and Necessity, that is not a rational decision. Chance is not rational. It is random. Necessity maybe rational, but it is not good, because it is value free.
> [quote=âwikipedia, post:53, topic:43926â]
> an acceptance of the scientific assessment described in the first part of the quotation
> [/quote]
But is this âscientific assessmentâ true? I am challenging the accuracy of this âscientificâ assessment and get nothing but flak for trying to engage in a rational fact based discussion.
> [quote=âwikipedia, post:53, topic:43926â]
> Sociologist Howard L. Kaye has suggested that Monod failed in his attempt to banish âmind and purpose from the phenomenon of lifeâ in the name of science. It may be more accurate to suggest that Monod sought to include mind and purpose within the purview of scientific investigation, rather than attributing them to supernatural or divine causes.
> [/quote]
It seems to me that continues the Western view dualism of physics and metaphysics, but while most people put the mind on the side of metaphysics he assumes that it is on the side of physics arbitrarily, that is without justification. This seems par for the course for atheists today. They say that mind is physical like the rest of the body, because they want it to be.
> [quote=âmitchellmckain, post:53, topic:43926â]
> The rational is no more than the ability to follow a set of rules consistently
> [/quote]
I disagree. Rationality is the ability to analyze a situation or a problem and make a viable solution. It is the ability to create something fresh and original, rather than to keep on doing the same old thing. Animals can learn from experience and plants grow by following their sensors, so they are rational up to a point.
The Greeks tended to equate soul with the mind, thinking with the spiritual. They saw and we still see humans as having a mind and body not a body, mind, and spirit. The Jewish/Christian tradition made the heart/spirit separate from the mind.
> [quote=@mitchellmckain, post:53, topic:43926"]
> What we need to rethink is this very idea that meaning and purpose come from rationality after all â and rather than looking for God and our humanity in things like intelligent design or cleverness we should be looking for them in another aspect of human existence altogether â love and the human heart.
> [/quote]
This is true, but is contrary to the thrust of atheism today.
The biggest problem for atheist science is the most important scientific discovery of the 20th century, the Big Bang, the Beginning of energy, matter, time, and space. This is the reason God will never disappear. Because God is Real. Instead of arguing over God we need to be working together to bring people together in love.