The only argument for the existence of God which I have endorsed is “The Neglected Argument” written by Charles Sanders Pierce, described here. The reason I gave was “because it gets a handle on the subjective nature of the choice to believe.” A more cynical description would be that it embraces the fallacy of circularity as if that were a virtue rather than a logical failing. LOL
I agree up to a point. I have said it before and I will say it again… the burden of proof is ALWAYS on the person who expects other people to agree. Whether it is an atheist with some nonsense about how negative claims are special and don’t require proof, or a Christian who has made the Bible the limits of any reality which he will acknowledge – no amount of such special pleading puts the burden of proof on the person you have decided must agree with you.