I think certainly with respect to medicine we agree. And of course there wasn’t anything particularly unusual or miraculous about the nephrectomy itself when I lost my kidney, for instance, but some of the surprising (and delightful) timing of causally unrelated circumstances (from an earthly perspective) and events before and after it.
Of course I’m going to bring up the cases of Maggie and Rich Stearns and the miraculous timing of discrete and disjointed sets of events – disjointed except for the individuals in common and the obvious imputed meaning. So the sliding scale of believability and attribution to miraculous intervention is not really a function of the circumstances so much as it is the presuppositions of the individual interpreting them and what they bring to the table in terms of background and faith. Some refuse to recognize God’s providential M.O. no matter how impossibly unlikely the multiple particular circumstances, but that is not the fault of the factual evidence.