Roger, I have been completely forthcoming with my worldview about who and what God is. On the other hand, you beat around the bush, so to speak (I am not being arrogant or sarcastic here… just saying it as it is). I spend time researching and writing well articulated commentaries expressing my views on important points in response to yours. However, what I receive in return is “half baked” comments (you hardly ever answer anything directly, clearly, or completely). So, how am I supposed to know what you believe?
On the other hand, I know what Christianity teaches, what the masses believe, and understand the plight of the poor souls who are lost because of all this confusion (Babel).
How about for a change you describe what you believe about who or what God is as opposed to “the white haired bearded man in the sky,” and as opposed to the “multiverse” scenario. What remains is a “big bang” from nothing (ex nihilo). So, is the “big bang” which expands to create the universe God? Well, no, because you don’t believe in pantheism or panentheism. Or, is “the nothing” which caused the “big bang” God? Yes, maybe you believe God is “the nothing” from which everything came into existence. However, this is irrational considering we live in a rational universe… remember! It would seem that you are trapped in the corner Roger!!! I am very much looking forward to your answer. Surprise me!
What common ground? You don’t explain what your ground is. You would like for me to agree with you on what? You don’t articulate what your position is. Finally, yes, it is alright for us to not agree… but to not agree on what? Either way—if you articulate your position, I’ll show you courtesy and I’ll agree to disagree, if we actually do disagree. If you don’t articulate your position, well… I’ll still show you courtesy, I’ll peaceably agree to give up the discussion with you, since it would be pointless to continue.