Well I’ll have a go. This is about the metaphor of literal original sin that Christians read in to Paul and the heresy of PSA that follows. As @MarkD says, hence YEC.
I would have expected you to be familiar with the concept of the Paschal Lamb, slain from before the foundation of the world. What a heresy, both OT and New.
Sorry? Why wouldn’t I be? What does Jesus, God’s Wow! signal, fitting Himself as glove to the hand of culture, have to do with anything beyond that?
The truth of the Pascal Lamb is all about love and PSA.
They are mutually exclusive. Black and white. God is Love. There is no PSA in Love. It can’t be added to Love, alongside Love.
I can understand why you don’t like Paul.
In all things show yourself to be an example of good deeds, with purity in doctrine…
I don’t understand why you think I don’t like Paul. He proclaims the faithfulness of Christ in saving all. I don’t like damnationist non-phenomenonological interpretations of Paul.
You are allowed to believe that.
…in spite of all the contrary evidence which you appear to selectively ignore or rationalize around.
…we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.
…the Lord avenges all such sins, as we have solemnly warned you before.
I could continue, but maybe you get the point. (And your “non-phenomenonological interpretations” red herring cannot swim against the tide.)
Love is Hate. Hate is Love. I suppose it’s born of incompetence.
Love is Hate. Hate is Love. I suppose it’s born of incompetence
It must be Jesus.
Paul elaborates somewhat, adding his own incompetence.
Paul elaborates somewhat, adding his own incompetence.
That has got to be the strangest use of that passage I have ever seen. ??? Did you quote the wrong passage?
You don’t see that both passages are about judgment and justice?
These are fitting, too:
My response.
In a vision my spirit beheld
A wondrous sight - the Son of Man
I beheld a world in peace
In which all the people rejoiced
On their faces a light shone
The Spirit filled them with love divine
Every gesture and thought a prayer
Prayers of gratitude and thanks given
As an offering for the Prince of Peace.
My spirit beheld over centuries of time
Mankind progressing against the oppressor, whom we despise
For the suffering and affliction that fills the earth.
Though humanity to the brink of destruction would come,
We turned away because of the sacrifice of the Son.
God in His Mercy decreed
Mankind live according to His divine Will.
I asked the elder to explain to me
When will my splendid vision come to pass
I wished to rejoice for humanity
To sing and tell my neighbour,
“Oh, come and believe
Suffering will end, our tears will cease
No more the oppressor, no more deceit
We shall live in joy and be free”.
My vision filled me with wonder
So I asked the elder
When will mankind live in such splendour?
When we, God’s arms, make it so.
do we explain the difference in morality that people have ?
Christianity (the Gospel) introduced a radical understanding of moral/activities of humanity, which is that human beings must undergo a change in spirit and heart before we can even discuss, let alone act, with total goodness and reject all evil. So we cannot turn to does and don’ts, but instead become Christ like, with intent, act and understanding derived from goodness. Such a change is not biological but spiritual, and applies to all humanity (theists, atheists, and all else). A good starting point is the sermon on the mount.
The Sermon on the Mount is the change in spirit and heart. Do it and your spirit and heart change.
There are atheists who are more christlike than christians.So how would you explain that
What do you think needs to be explained - every human being bases his/her acts on the good and evil outlook and what they choose. So there are those who say they are atheists and choose the good as they understand it, and there are those who say they are Christians who nonetheless choose the bad (and vice-versa)