@Relates
Actually… Our discussion in my introductory topic, where we were mostly free to discuss whatever, was pretty much concluded. This thread was in response to @EvanFlick in the original sin thread, who raised the topic of Edward Feser and hylemorphic dualism.
Since the words “substance dualism” was not contained in the post he responded to, this comment did not make much sense. So I told him I would start a new thread to address the topic.