The best response to YEC quote mining ever.
this would be a good podcast episode
Yes, they claim to have a âbiblical worldviewâ but fail to recognize the worldview they use to see the bible through.
Interesting observation.
One of those âchickensâ is lies, and another is pigeonholing.
Yeah. I recall, after having met Morris, wondering if he even realized how deceptive he was, or (being gracious) had become. A friend who was with me observed that Morris argued like a high school freshman, grabbing onto anything that looked like it might support him.
One which is as destructive in policies as their âtheologyâ is spiritually.
I once pointed out that the early Christians lived in a society where things worse than most horror films were a part of everyday life. I got charged with enjoying the horror (real non-sequitur there!), to which I replied that if laughing at it constituted âenjoyingâ then I was guilty.
Left them speechless.
This brought to mind one of my education profs and an observation he made one day: itâs commonly said that cognitive dissonance is unsettling, but thatâs only true if youâre aware of it â which in return reminds me of a psychiatristâs remark that the primary mental activity of most human beings is to tell themselves convenient little lies.
I have used this: take two Bible verses and put them togetherâ
âJudas went and hanged himself; go thou and do likewise.â
The almost universal protest is that Iâm taking them out of context.
For humor my sister used this:
âWe all like sheep.â
So believers should have a favorable attitude towards sheep . . .
I get the impression that many young earthists have a completely different understanding of what constitutes deception and lying in the first place. A lot of them seem to view lying in exclusively spiritual termsâthe Bible describes the devil as the father of lies so that means that they end up viewing lying entirely in those terms. The concept of lying as such things as misrepresenting evidence, not having accurate measurements, or quote mining, doesnât even seem to be on their radar.
My big worry about this is that it can all too easily spill over into other areas of life. For example, I once heard someone describing a ten year old schoolboyâs money making idea as God having given him exceptional business wisdom. In actual fact the idea in question was nothing more nor less than a form of price gouging.
I would refer them to Martin Luther, doctor of the scriptures:
You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
What does this mean?
We should fear and love God so that we do not tell lies about our neighbor, betray him, slander him, or hurt his reputation, but defend him, speak well of him, and explain everything in the kindest way.
Defining âFaithâ is needed. Basically, it is putting trust in something. It is true that, to say that I see the sunshine coming in the window right now, I am putting faith in the reliability of my senses, the accuracy of my interpretation (e.g., I correctly remember that the sun is the main source of daytime outdoor light on earth), etc. Pseudoscientific atheism ignores the many ways that it depends on faith when it tries to use semantics to circularly âproveâ that faith is irrational. Their popular argument boils down to âI claim that faith is the opposite of reason, therefore anything I label as faith is unreasonable.â Although certain philosophical positions challenge such faith in the reliability of the senses and the existence of physical reality (including the more extreme or more popularized versions of postmodernism), it is common sense and a practical necessity to assume that our senses do give meaningful information and that we can reasonably interpret that information. At the same time, we need to remember the limitations that constrain the reliability of our senses and reasoning. Also, it is reasonable to ask what justification we have for those assumptions.
Faith in something may be more or less justified by the evidence. Has the source been reliable in what you can verify? Is it consistent? etc.
Well ill beâŚsomeone other than me whos quoting a Seventh Day Adventist theologian (Samuel was SDA)
This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.