You cannot belief that—but those of us who have actually written such programs and seen them solve problems far beyond our own ability to device solutions to a wide variety of problems, even those unrelated to biology “believe” in such programs because they work! OF COURSE it bolsters the theory because it demonstrates that the mathematics are sound!
You’ve been asked to show the math behind your claims—but like every other argument and evidence refuting your claims, you simply ignore them!
Your entire denialist argument comes down to “I consider these ideas evil and I can’t believe them!” That’s not an argument. That’s not contrary evidence. It is just an expression of your personal stubbornness and defiance.
Do you have any SUBSTANTIVE arguments? Or do you make decisions entirely on the basis of your emotions and “common sense”? I don’t think you understand that other people don’t make decisions as you do.
Most of all I’m amazed at how defiant you are of the wisdom and power of God. Your entire argument comes down to “No, I don’t think God would do things that way because I wouldn’t do things that way!”
Why would it be “silly”? Evidence is far from silly. However, at least your calling it silly reminds readers of why you don’t understand scientific evidence.
Wrong. Why would that refute evolution? And why do you pretend that feathers only have one purpose? For example, they are often very useful for retaining body heat.
What is “devolving”? I’ve never seen it in a science textbook. Perhaps you could define it for us and how you made that determination.
By the way, ALL POPULATIONS of organisms are evolving. (The only exception would be when a population is in its last gasps of dying out because reproduction has stopped. Evolution depends upon reproduction.)
Where there is reproduction, evolution is at work. Nothing stops evolution except extinction. (Of course, other living populations evolve in response to another population’s extinction.)
Grog, do you have arguments that are based on anything except denial of things you don’t understand?
And wouldn’t your arguments be stronger if you bothered to learn what evolution is? That would help you to avoid making more of your straw man arguments.