I have the impression that Roger’s insistence on interpreting almost everything (man, Creation, and even the Bible) as being triune actually does more harm than good to the doctrine of the Trinity. The Church Fathers spent large amounts of ink for distinguishing the Trinity from earthly analogies that give way to modalism, arianism, partialism, or other non-trinitarian beliefs. Earthly images always end up mischaracterizing the doctrine of the Trinity in one way or another.