Irreducible Complexity and other Tangents

[T_aquaticus (The Friendly Neighborhood Atheist)]

@RichardG

I do not need your approval of IC. It is an established concept. The trouble is, you have shown that you do not accept the meaning as relevant to evolution. That, again, is common sense. Instead you change the meaning to allow evolution to proceed.

You haven’t produced any evidence demonstrating that IC systems can’t evolve. All you can provide is “because I say so”.

@RichardG

You keep asking for proof of something that cannot happen. That is a proof of your lack of common sense. It is the logical fallacy you are claiming of me.

I am asking for evidence, not proof. Asking for evidence is not a logical fallacy.

If you have no evidence, then there is no reason to take your claims seriously.