Since you’re a Moderator here, Mervin, I won’t press. Your generalization in this case, unfortunately, doesn’t answer my specific question (Does BioLogos position itself against the people, almost entirely atheists, who promote “evolutionary religious studies?). Be welcome to try again if you wish.
Evidence for BioLogos invited authors positioning BioLogos as being against “evolutionary religious studies” should be available to support a simple “Yes” answer in BioLogos archives, so there’s no reason to argue about it. Please simply point to such evidence (names of authors, texts, etc.) of BioLogos actively positioning itself against evolutionary religious studies, as you are familiar with the archive. In addition to “resonance” being expected, what is the written evidence to show for this positioning?
Otherwise, “No,” from what I have up to now read in the archive, seems to be a more accurate answer regarding BioLogos’ lack of activity produced against evolutionary religious studies so far. Most of BioLogos’ attention seems to be directed at young earth creationism and creationists, then a secondary concern is Intelligent Design theory and apologetics. Is that not the case?
Forgive, as I do not wish to argue, just explore. And there’s no argument against evidence, so please just link to BioLogos’ activity that it seems you are now suggesting “is real”. I will be most pleased to discover this real activity against evolutionary religious studies in the archive from BioLogos leaders. That way we can seek the truth together. Thanks.