That is true!
I’ve often wondered about this myself. It seems to me a classic “cry wolf” scenario where all their more needed warnings on much more dangerous chemicals are deprecated when one sees they are over the top on their warnings about plain table salt! After all, if they’re willing to act that dire about salt, then maybe all the rest of their warnings are exaggerated too! I’ve never figured out why anyone would shoot their own system in the foot like that other than the usual litigation sensitivities which force them to do it (to the same result).
[Besides … NaCl often also comes with another toxic component in it: Iodine! Strike two!]
3 Likes
I was a kid long enough ago that chemistry kits were not boring, and sold with chemicals which would make a liability lawyer choke - literally. The more awesome chemicals came in bottles marked with skulls and crossbones.
There were train tracks nearby (just our demographic), where chunks of sulphur would come off the bulk cars. I read that heating this in a test tube with paraffin wax would produce lethal hydrogen sulphide gas. In my basement lair, I drew glass tubing into a nozzle though a stopper, and lit the off gas to a satisfying flame, which was oxidizing to the somewhat less poisonous sulphur dioxide.
My mother was unawares upstairs, where she though the gates of hell opened up and filled the house with the rotten egg stench of brimstone. Fortunately or otherwise, I survived my childhood to do engineering with gases on a much larger scale; all legit - no need to call Saul.
5 Likes
I’ve found one for water that said to wash your hands if it came in contact with you.
5 Likes
I’m sorry, but, being on the spectrum, how does nurd apply, and circle n. cannot be described as followed which is for a verb. And how does circle cf. ecology?
Nurd: The comic strip, B.C., often/always starts with a prelude of sorts. Something absurd, like an ant reworking the rhyme “Step on a crack and break your motherls back.” Those two frames really just set the tone: something silly with dictionaries, words, definitions.
Ecology: B.C. Starts looking up the parts of the definitions he doesn’t understand in this terrible dictionary. When he gets to “circle” the definition is “to end up where you began.” So he goes back to the word “ecology”, the point where he began looking up words.
It’s absurd. B.C. Learns nothing. He also understands nothing from his efforts.
2 Likes
Ah, Very good. Thank you. Especially the ‘he gets to “circle” the definition is “to end up where you began.” So he goes back to the word “ecology”, the point where he began looking up words.’.
BUT that is still not the definition of the NOUN circle!
2 Likes
It IS a terrible dictionary.
Written by and for cavemen.
2 Likes
Or as out physics professor did, pretend to stumble and throw a canister of liquid nitrogen across the front row of the class, right after showing how a rose dipped into the stuff shatters.
Mine has magnesium and potassium as well!
3 Likes
And some just has dirt, and is sold as “sea salt.”
3 Likes
Ahh yes! “I can’t come to bed yet, honey - somebody on the Internet is wrong!”. Biologos must be one of the epicenters of all that! How much would you sell it for?
7 Likes
Great idea! I also had an idea that you could make a double helix out of agape symbols (fish) and make a cross out of them for a t -shirt or coffee cup. Ill try to work on that.
2 Likes
Safety Data Sheets are a legal requirement, but unlike in Europe, the US has no legal requirement for accuracy nor for correction. Many of them have obviously been farmed out to some hack who doesn’t know what they are doing. I think it was a SDS for sodium chloride that had copied info for another chemical. For water, not only are you supposed to wash it off if you get it on you, you need to remove any clothing that it gets on.
But more serious are the terrible jobs done with actual hazards. “No information found” often appears to mean “I did a search for “Our company’s special mix safety information” and got no hits”, as the ingredients often have very easily located safety considerations.
2 Likes
Yeah, no, I think I’ll limit my trademark infringement to making the image. 
2 Likes
Too bad - I was thinking I’d buy one!
3 Likes
That reminded me . . .
“I don’t have a standard deviation – all my deviations are eccentric”.
4 Likes
So, are you saying you are all variance? Or are you just being contrary?
3 Likes