Has the Faith/ Science debate really shifted?

Now we know from those who are OCD in awe of what God has made. We can take a lesson from the parable of the talents, “I reap where I have not sown.” Many scientists learn to awe what has been made and that brings them to God. Those without that awe nonetheless educate all of us in the delirious joy and majesty in Genesis 1:1,3 [omitting verse 2 because it grandfathers in the prior pagan cosmology] - “God created time, space, matter, and light.”

We have learned in the past 250 years enough about Creation to fill thousands of scrolls of ancient Hebrew - which would have clouded out the theology of Creator God, intentional and desirous of communion with us His children. In fact a mere part of a scroll revealed the Creator. Genesis is theology adapted to a time when the real details of Creation were unimportant. Revealing God as Creator is the precious message.

To God be all the glory.

1 Like

As a youth taking instruction in the [Missouri Lutheran] Christian faith, Pastor drew a Circle of all Believers with many wedge-scrawls, part inside and part outside that Circle. Each blob was a church congregation or denomination or movement. God knows my heart, and the hearts of all who allege to follow.

Or in other words, quoting Pogo, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

I’ve always been a big fan of The Big Bang Theory and have seen some episodes in rerun so many times I’ve practically memorized them. I’ve also watched many episodes from Young Sheldon, though none from the final season. Eventually, I’ll catch them on Netflix.

There’s a really interesting narrative arc within the two shows that speaks to the question of why we need connections of the heart, not just connections of the mind.

Going chronologically, we see a very young Sheldon Cooper who is struggling to fit his very big intellect into a very ordinary human life. He sees what his family members do not. But this cuts both ways, because his family members have big enough hearts to make space for Sheldon to be himself – something Sheldon cannot do for others until the end of adult series.

At the start of the 12-season Big Bang Theory, Sheldon has kind of fallen into the dark side of the mind. He’s so enamoured of his own brilliance that he lacks compassion, empathy, trust, and courage (all of which he considers a complete waste of his precious mental energy).

His problem looks on the surface like an either/or debate between science and faith. But it isn’t. His problem is logic suppressing love. The battleground where this plays out in the series is science. But it could be any major aspect of human endeavour: religion, education, identity politics. We see the suffering caused by logic suppressing love throughout our world today.

In the early years of the adult series, Sheldon believes he doesn’t need anyone else to help lift him to the heights of his natural genius, but his research suffers until he finally learns to balance his logic with his love. His friendships and his love for Amy make him a better scientist – maybe because the biological brain inevitably starves itself of healthy, broad-minded thinking and processing networks if love isn’t part of the mix.

Sheldon’s journey is about the great weight of knowledge, the heaviness of it when it isn’t balanced by the uplifting effect of love, a mysterious universal force that creates bubbles and spaces and voids in which other people can expand to their true potential. (Even God’s universe is filled with cosmic voids.)

As a society, we’re all struggling with the great weight of knowledge. With the internet and social media, we can hardly get away from it. We think the solution to the problems created by too much knowledge is . . . . more knowledge, better knowledge, faster knowledge. But maybe, if we want to hear what God is saying to us through the medium of science, we need more love.

Christianity (that is, the teachings of Jesus) offers people the option to balance both mind and heart in our daily lives. Not all Christians want this balance, as we know from our history and from our current news. But it’s there if we want it, and it produces some pretty amazing fruits – especially a balanced, mature relationship with a loving God outside the rigid boundaries of religious doctrine and ritual.

At the end of The Big Bang Theory, Sheldon and Amy win the Nobel Prize in Physics for their theory of Super Asymmetry – not symmetry, but asymmetry. The balance of heart and mind is nothing if not beautifully and divinely asymmetrical.

4 Likes

Yes and Iain McGilchrist in his book The Matter With Things says the same adding that the knowledge of the heart is more important. We need both but it is the implicit, embodied knowledge of experience without which we suffer more. Knowledge of the mind proceeds by making distinctions while knowledge of the heart operates by seeking the big picture. We are most directly involved in knowledge of the mind and that involvement can lead to inflation of self importance which heart knowledge can keep in check by seeing the self as part of something greater. We are as we are not only because of what our minds can do but also because of how our cultures have befit us to attune to something greater than our narrow self interest.

Welcome back, by the way.

1 Like

In the past 250 or so years Science has taken a serious look at Creation itself, beginning with geology (late 18th Century) which required an Earth that was ancient beyond our ability to guess, then fossils which (re)demonstrated the plain role of evolution. Darwin grew up immediately after that, and formulated his idea of the “how” - theories explain puzzling facts and Natural Selection explained the way evolution could proceed.
Prior to then, a literal Genesis was inescapable. God said it, so there it is. So take a look at the first chapter:

Verse two grandfathers in the extant pagan cosmology of a timeless universe, all featureless water, until theistic intervention (two female gods, one of whom finally killed the other) began making changes. But verses 1 and 3 clearly admonish the age of science that God created, at one go, time space matter and light, The age of science has a name for that.

Days Two Three and Four trip over what God made. An eternal supply of rain above the vault of the sky does not impede the passages of all the rest of the visible universe (sun moon stars). Earth is a ball with a thin crust of continents cradled in surrounding films of water, hence not extractable “from the deeps of water.” Earth orbits the nearest star while the moon orbits earth. Days of Creation make a great stage scrim for the drama of Creation to play out in brief with the focus on the Creator.

This just may have convinced me to actually watch the show!

Not actually; there were plenty of scholars who didn’t consider the opening to be literal.

Not in Genesis.

1 Like

This makes me think of what McGilchrist says about division and unity. Making distinctions is important but so is seeing the big picture, how all the pieces fit. We need both even though they are not equally important.

Not actually; there were plenty of scholars who didn’t consider the opening to be literal.

Depends on the “then. Voltaire didn’t consider it relevant, much less literal. But he was early.”

Not in Genesis.
[/quote]
Exactly. Creation and Genesis don’t make good company. Genesis is theology about the Creator and Creation itself is what God really made. Theology via crisp, clear, simple details and one-dimensional actors is both robust and holy.

This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.