Doesn’t agree with the evidence which is that the universe is expanding forever and beyond the capability of any living organism to reach. There is no TOE supported by the evidence let alone forced by it.
That doesn’t make it correct and the evidence disagrees.
This is one of the problems with metaphysical speculations based on old physics – our understanding keeps changing. It doesn’t invalidate the findings of science as Kuhn suggested but speculations (especially philosophical speculations) based on those findings is another matter.
What is required by their philosophical premises is not the same as what conclusions are required by the evidence revealed in scientific investigation.
No. There are those who put their philosophical bias ahead of what the evidence tells us but most modern physicists stick to the methodology of science and accept what it tells us, which most certainly is not a confirmation of your theology.
LOL Your ridiculous simplification of the problems of modern physics is laughable.
I believe God exists – the God of the Bible not the God of philosophical proofs. And I don’t think God requires us to believe He exists – i.e. no proof supplied.