Yes and the denial of this is a good example of putting philosophical bias ahead of what the evidence tells us. Calling it decoherence rather than wave collapse doesn’t change this in the slightest, such rhetoric doesn’t alter the irrefutable facts that measurements take you from a state of superposition with respect to a measurement to an eigenstate of that measurement.
What is true, is that before this evidence scientists presupposed that the universe was steady-state and Einstein called it his greatest mistake that he added a term in his gravitational field equation to support this. But once evidence was found for the expansion of the universe, scientists accepted they were wrong about the universe being steady state and developed the so called big bang theory. It is a great irony that religious people spoke against this theory even though it was indeed one of the very few things where religion could claim that it was right in claiming the universe had a beginning. But @JamesRedford 's revision of history regarding this issue is dishonest.