Hi David. Thanks. I don’t have time to watch the entire video. Can you indicate a time stamp, or say what “the point” that Dawkins was silent on was? If “the point” is a philosophical interpretive one, i.e. not testable by methodological naturalism, then it could be appropriate that Dawkins was silent. In other words, the scientific method is not intended to provide all answers in life, or answer questions of metaphysical control (or not) of material processes.
cheers