It says nothing of the sort. But evolution is obviously not your strong point so until you learn what it actually is you won’t be able to produce any coherent arguments against it.
The statement that “all life began as a chemical” does nothing to make the distinctions you are hoping. All creationists would agree that we are made of dust (that involves chemicals).
You obviously show a bit more familiarity at least with Genesis (or I suppose so, anyway, - since your list appears to have jargon or foreign characters in it I don’t recognize.) From the parts that do appear to have a theme, it would seem you are eager to establish that “day” means 24 hour day. Okay. Suppose it does. A lot of people here would agree that a normal meaning of “day” is actually in play here, but they don’t then draw from that all that you apparently do: that it is all supposed to be a modern blow-by-blow mechanical account of how it all went down.