Hi @dcscccc - I hope you are enjoying God’s love today.
Actually, I cannot think of a more irrelevant question. The plans for manufacturing doors are not passed on to future generations through genetic mechanisms.
You have made the fundamental error of confounding quantity with quality. The lens in a human eye is much, much more complex than the 16,000 lenses in that first eye.
I will illustrate with some simple programming pseudo-code.
/* Sample 1: Find the lowest non-negative integer and print it 16,000 times */
unsigned int i = integer.random()
while (i > 0) { i–; }
for (j = 0; j < 16,000; j++) {print i;}
/* Sample 2: Now let’s find the largest prime number less than 10^16,000 and print it just once */
i = FindThatPrimeWithAMillionLinesOfCode()
print i;
What you’re saying about eye lenses is like saying the second programming task is simpler than the first because the print instruction (the final line) is slightly shorter. The statement about print instructions is true, but the conclusion of greater simplicity for sample 2 does not follow; itt ignores the million lines of code it takes to find that prime number, as compared to the one line of code that it takes to get from a random positive integer to zero.
Sigh. How many times have various commentators here tried to explain incomplete lineage sorting to you, @dcscccc? The most notable example was Dennis Venema’s comment to you in March, which describes how observed patterns in genomic analysis conform with the patterns predicted by evolutionary population genetics.
I also explained incomplete lineage sorting to you with an example of trait similarities with cousins vs. with brothers.
Do you remember these explanations of ILS, d? Do you understand why ILS perfectly explains the ERV data in primates?