El Código de Adán: Un Modelo de Involución Genómica ante las Leyes Universales de la Termodinámica y la Información

[T_aquaticus (The Friendly Neighborhood Atheist)]

@Vinnie

Law of Genetic Entropy: Based on the work of geneticists such as Dr. John Sanford, my thesis relies on the observation that mutations are predominantly deleterious or neutral–deleterious. The mutational load accumulated in each generation is an inescapable law.

@glipsnort did a good job of exposing the myriad of problems with Sanford’s work in this thread:

Of Mice and Men and John Sanford's Genetic Entropy

Here is a fuller reply to a recent post on GE. Genetic Entropy [ GE ], the signature model of John Sanford, is incoherent with observed everyday reality. An aeronautical scientist can publish a book full of arcane math, intimidating physics, computer simulations, and overflowing bibliographies, to prove that “bumblebees cannot fly”, and a layperson who has little grasp of the technicalities can confidently pronounce that he is wrong. Flying bumblebees can readily be observed. Similarly, desp…

In summary, Sanford’s work just doesn’t work. It doesn’t demonstrate what he claims. This is not a law of nature.

@Vinnie

Second Law of Thermodynamics: The fundamental law of the universe dictates that closed systems tend toward disorder (S). Present-day life is a survival system that fights entropy through the ingestion of decomposing organic matter (bacterial-based nutrition).

The Corpus Gloriae functioned as an open system in a state of perfect steady-state equilibrium. It received energy from a non-entropic external source (the Spirit or Kairos), allowing metabolism to be a transformation of pure energy without toxic byproducts. Our current dependence on the microbiota and bacterial digestion is an emergency “biological prosthesis.” After the expulsion from Eden (Genesis 3:23), the system closed, forcing human biology to ally itself with agents of decomposition in order to extract energy from an already degraded environment.

Humans can digest food without their microbiota. With that said, none of this makes sense and no evidence is given for the claims.

@Vinnie

Phenotypic Plasticity and Epigenetics: Science demonstrates that an organism can drastically change its form and diet depending on the environment (phenotypic deviation). There is evidence of herbivorous structures in the ancestors of obligate carnivores.

I propose Luciferian Manipulation. Lucifer, possessing knowledge of biological laws, forced changes in genetic expression within fauna to introduce chaos. However, this corruption was containable. As long as Adam maintained his authority (Genesis 1:28), he functioned as a “genomic regulator” of the biosphere. The human fall in Genesis 3 was the breaking of the seal: when the head sinned, all creation was “subjected to futility” (Romans 8:20), allowing Luciferian manipulation to become the irreversible biological law we observe in the fossil record.

No evidence given of this manipulation.

@Vinnie

Hayflick Limit and Physical Constants: Present-day human biology has a programmed limit on cellular divisions (the Hayflick Limit), restricting us to a maximum of roughly 120 years—precisely what God decreed in Genesis 6:3.

The event of the Fall reconfigured the relationship between matter and time. In Kairos, cellular regeneration was infinite. Upon entering Chronos, biology became trapped within the thermodynamic arrow of time. The Flood marked the inflection point at which atmospheric and genomic protection collapsed, resulting in an exponential decline in longevity. We are not “evolving”; our biological clock is running down because the system no longer receives the “recharge” from its original source.

Again, no evidence given of these claims.

@Vinnie

This thesis has been constructed to be coherent with both the records and Scripture. I do not seek acceptance by faith, but examination through causal coherence.

Given the lack of evidence, there doesn’t seem to be much difference between faith and “causal coherence”. All we are given is bare assertions.