EC and Romans 1:19-20

[MarkE]

@jpm

@MarkE

…should that lead to a robust deduction that there is no plausible naturalistic, provisionally posit supernatural action.

I think that you and Christy agree that there can be miracles, not explained by scientific means. The point of disagreement seems to be that you feel that science can reach the conclusion that there are miracles. Can you give one example of that?

Abiogenesis, potentially:

Can science provide evidence for supernatural agency?

To be clear, I’m not advocating god-of-the-gaps thinking, and acknowledge the risk of falling into it. Rather, I’m considering the possibility of situations where scientific evidence might reasonably suggest divine action. A key qualifier is, has the field in question had sufficient time to thoroughly search for naturalistic explanations? Of course, that’s a subjective assessment, and so this will be an “on the balance of the evidence” individual judgement. Here’s an illustration of what I’m …