Hi Mark:
Sorry to have taken a while to get back to you. We are busy launching The Atomic Biology Institute in two countries as well as getting our second book out, this one called “Darwin’s Replacement”.
Over the last 31 years, we have (with the help of 45 scholars including 20 PhDs) researched deeper than cellular biology and deeper than molecular biology, down to where the action is at the atomic level.
To answer your question regarding why we believe evolution cannot cause life, some of the reasons are outlined in my previous posts in this thread. The reasons also take up about 200 pages of our second book. With little space here, we can supply just a few of the basics.
Let’s go down to a cell construction site near the end of your right hand forefinger, for example. The first choice and decision has to be what type of cell to build at this particular position on the atom supply line (the adjacent blood vessel carrying the building block atoms from your digestive system).
Perhaps a fingernail cell, or a bone cell, or a skin cell, or a muscle cell, or a nerve cell, or a vessel cell - these are some choices from which to make a decision. Other decisions are where to stop making one type of cell and begin building another type of cell.
Obviously, cells cannot just replicate because we would just be a bunch of sperm and egg cells.
So let’s decide that a muscle cell is required at this particular cell construction site. Now billions more decisions, choices have to be made for selections of the counted right numbers of the right elemental atoms from the vessel. Also, the sequence of cell parts has to be decided in order to carefully construct the exterior cell membrane, nucleus, nuclear membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, nucleolus, RNA, DNA, chromosomes, ribosomes, proteins, vacuole, cytoplasm, protoplasm, golgi, lysosomes, wiring to our brain for control, etc., etc., etc.
The phenomenal numbers of choices, decisions, and super-intelligent physical works with atoms must be carefully and speedily performed at each cell construction site.
Remember that the three 2016 Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry received their reward for developing over a 33 year period, a few very simplistic molecular machines by knitting together a relatively few atoms. These little units are almost infinitely more simplistic than the simplest molecular machine among those listed above.
Three of our brightest scientists in this field over 33 years using sophisticated equipment which would never fit into any of our cell construction sites. Call these three scientists, “molecular machine building mechanisms”. They showed that, bright as they are, they did not have anywhere near enough intelligence or skills to build even the simplest molecular machine for any of our new cells that are made for us every day of the week.
So saying “Oh, our ‘natural mechanisms’ build our molecular machines” just opens up another huge batch of problems for evolution. These “mechanisms” have to be built, and they need to be built with more intelligence and skills than the Nobel Winners.
As evolution has no intelligence to use, it is thus actually falsified as the cause of life.
That is where this evidence leads.
Now we have to convince the science community that our society is best, and most honorably served, when science goes where the evidence leads, and without reprisal.
We believe the Christians in science groups will have to unite on the points of science we can agree upon and drop the points we cannot agree upon. In this way we can develop a single new science as the best, most logical, and verifiable life-science to present to education departments.
As a start along this road we have begun gathering single sheets of “Science Agreeables” to form the basis for this new united science. See www.atomicbiology.com