I see Genesis 1 as circular poetry. It follows the poetic requirements beautifully. That is how it would have been read before misunderstanding turned it into a linear list. A list distorts the connections made, which are obvious in the poem. When read as circular poetry, all the scientific problems that you mention go away. All of them. The creation story is the story of reality. Poetically Harmonizing Genesis with Science
I also believe Genesis 1 was a vision of reality. It took a master poet to write this masterpiece of literature that describes the reality of nature from the Big Bang to the introduction of humanity without any of our current knowledge available to him. That kind of vision requires inspiration from the God mentioned in the text. Divine inspiration lets the words in this text speak to all the generations and in the context of each generation’s understanding of the cosmos.
Of course, there are those on this site that reject the concept of concordism. I reject reading this inspired text as a myth when it can be viewed as reality described by modern science.