Do you think theistic evolution is more compatible with inclusivism or exclusivism?

[RichardG (Richard Gillett)]

@St.Roymond

@RichardG

Does that mean that they agree with you>

It means that they operate using logic and evidence without introducing opinion or subjective thought.

So you dictate how I must think

@St.Roymond

@RichardG

@T_aquaticus

science should be thrown out if it contradicts your beliefs

And?

Yo fnfd that offensive> Fallacious? Wrong?

If you do so without logic or evidence then yes, it is wrong.

See above.

@St.Roymond

@RichardG

fter all, your choice of evidence is subjective.

If you can say that, then you never understood even the basics of a single science course.

(It is not worth even formulating a different response.

@St.Roymond

@RichardG

For instance, you claim that morality is not relevant to ToE.

(I claim otherwise)

Then you’re not talking about ToE, you’re talking about your own feelings. ToE isn’t capable of addressing ethics, it is only capable of addressing what can be observed.

For ToE Read Saint Roymond

@St.Roymond

@RichardG

Am I “making things up” when I include them?

You’re certainly not doing science or engaging in rational thought!

Wich we have already established is a crime.

@St.Roymond

@RichardG

The actual question should be. Why must either view be the correct one?

Because fairies do not paint the colors on flowers.

I will not answer that here, but against a different post in another thread (I am sure you will find it and dismiss it)

Richard

Edit
This is the continuation I refered to
Please Define Evolutionary Creationism? I am finding the Biologos website articles defining it a bit vague. Im left with more questions than answers - Faith & Science Conversation - The BioLogos Forum