There is no such thing as “secular scientific interpretations.” There are honest scientific interpretations, and there are lies.
The rules of science are exactly the same for Christians and atheists alike. They are exactly the same whether God is at work or not. They are exactly the same whether miracles are a legitimate explanation for the evidence or not. They do not depend on how old the Earth is, or on who did or did not evolve from what.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Your interpretations of the physical evidence that we see in nature must consist of honest reporting and honest interpretation of accurate information. This should be completely non-negotiable for everyone. Measurements must be accurate and honest. All evidence must be accounted for. Quotes must accurately reflect the context from which they were taken. Interpretation of errors and discrepancies must be proportionate, neither exaggerating them nor downplaying them. Attempting to twist evidence to try to make it support a young earth, a global continent-shaping flood, or non-evolution, when quite clearly it does not support any of these things, is not being “critical of anything that is non biblical.” It is lying.
Talking about “secular science” or “secular scientific interpretations” is like talking about “secular facts” or “secular honesty” or “secular measurement.” It is simply patent nonsense.