Im not medical person, however my thought was always that a higher payload meant a higher viral count for a given droplet of infected spit/snot whatever.
To me if getting vaccinated meant there was a measurable correlation between vax and lower count, because the bodies immune system was able to detect the virus sooner as a result of training (the idea of vax if memory serves), then for that reason vax was thr best way forward given the likely swamping of hospitals with sick patients in the short to.medium term.
Hospitals swamped with additional highly infectious sick patients is never a good thing…people who are already sick are highly vulnerable to additional sickness…take golden staph as point and example. Its one thing to go into hospital with a relatively minor ailment /or injury but another to come out with golden staph. A neighbour of ours when i was a child got this from hospital and suffered immensly for many months.
Also, given the experience with flu’s and common colds, why would scientists claim it wouldnt mutate quickly if at all? That isnt something i consider logical and the conclusions of the article are what i have always thought given colds and flu’s. Even thoughh theologivally, im a bit of a legalist, following rule books shouldnt impede on common sense when we have other direct evidences that shed light on a lack of experience.
