If you haven’t applied your ‘crit’ to other sciences, you can’t know whether my statement is false.
Codswallop.
It’s possible to criticise evolution without accusing scientists of being biased, ignorant or unaware.
Bollocks. The ‘criticisms’ of ToE are frequently dismantled thoroughly.
For example:
The actual response to claims about irreducibility can be see e.g. here:
Most of the people you disparagingly refer to as “disciples of evolution” are fully aware that most of the supposed examples of ‘irreducible complexity’ are not in fact not irreducible (the Dover transcripts help a lot),that the ID simplification that components get added one-at-a-time and never change is a ridiculous misunderstanding of how evolution happens, that irreducible complexity is achievable by modifying existing components, and that it is not only an expected outcome of an evolving multi-part system but was actually described and predicted by Herman Muller in 1918, some 60 years before Behe wrote his book!
We aren’t in the slightest bit ‘allergic’ to arguments involving irreducible complexity, because they are soft balls that can be hit for six with minimal effort, and the only problem with dealing with them is the usual tendency of creationists to refuse to listen, and instead ignore the responses in which their pet ‘arguments’ are completely dismantled and repeat their false claims later or elsewhere as if they had never been addressed.
There are several reasons given there for rejecting the argument from irreducibility, and not one of them is ‘anything can be done in small steps’ or ‘ruining the theory’.
Your complaint is not only demonstrably false, it can be refuted using examples from this thread. Either you haven’t read the responses to irreducibility arguments, or you have and are lying about them.
ID is dismissed because it’s a scam aimed at getting creationism taught in schools, not because of a lack of a designer.
Once again you either don’t read responses, or do and are lying[1] about them.
The possibility that you are wrong doesn’t seem to have occurred to you.
Total inability to remember any responses is also a possibility, but only if accompanied by a total inability to remember not being able to remember any responses, a total inability to remember that such responses can be found within seconds using the search function[2] and an ability to remember things that don’t happen. ↩︎
In my experience, an inability and/or unwillingness to use search capabilities is a common trait among ID/creation advocates. ↩︎